CNN.com CNN.com -- Health
CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HLN



October 28, 2008
Posted: 01:50 PM ET

By Elizabeth Landau
CNN.com Health Writer/Producer

For several months I have enjoyed recording digital music files through my keyboard, thanks to a simple device that connects it to my laptop. But it wasn’t until recently that I discovered that the following label came with it:

WARNING: This product contains chemicals, including lead, known to the State of California to cause cancer, and birth defects or other reproductive harm. Wash hands after handling.

I freaked out. How could a set of cables attached to a small blue blinking cylinder cause cancer? The USB connector and keyboard inputs seemed harmless enough, and I hadn’t felt obvious symptoms while making music. Was I risking my life for the sake of my four-person fan base?

So I called the company, M-Audio. Apparently, manufacturers have to put this label on certain products to comply with Proposition 65, a California law that requires a warning on anything containing lead or other hazardous substances found to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

Under this law, whose full title is The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, warnings must be placed on products with a chemicals present in amounts larger than what the California government has decided is a “safe harbor number.”

These requirements are pretty strict. For example, for a cancer-causing chemical, according to the state’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, “a person exposed to the chemical at the ‘no significant risk level’ for 70 years would not have more than a ‘one in 100,000’ chance of developing cancer as a result of that exposure.” So, if there would be more than one excess case of cancer out of 100,000 people over a period of 70 years because of exposure to that amount of the substance, slap on that label.

It’s not just computing equipment. Amazon.com outlines for its customers required warnings for California consumers placed on tools, lead crystal glasses, ceramic tableware, jewelry, Tiffany style lamps, electrical cords, beauty products, and even motor vehicles.

The consequences for violating Proposition 65 can be pretty fierce. One Los Angeles company had to pay a $10 million fine for failing to label lead-tainted lunch boxes (they sold 100,000 of them to the state health department), the Los Angeles Times reported earlier this year.

Still, does that mean I have to wash my hands every time I touch the cord? Mark Williams, spokesperson for M-Audio, says, “No! My gosh, no!”

In general, he says, electronics products carry this label because of the materials used in circuit boards, such as lead, for example. It’s not like there’s pesticide sprayed on the surface, he says.

In fact, according to the company’s official statement on the issue, a device with a lead warning might not have any lead at all:

Even in situations where an electronics device is completely free of lead, there is always a chance that standard third-party-manufactured accessories packaged with the device (such as a power cable, USB cable, or power supply) may contain trace amounts of lead. Out of professional diligence and a commitment to fully comply with the law, M-Audio properly marks all applicable products with a Prop 65 lead warning.

Maybe people are used to seeing these labels by now. Williams said mine was the first call he’s received on the issue in his five months in media relations at the company.

So, now I will make my techno versions of acoustic indie songs in relative peace.

Editor’s Note: Medical news is a popular but sensitive subject rooted in science. We receive many comments on this blog each day; not all are posted. Our hope is that much will be learned from the sharing of useful information and personal experiences based on the medical and health topics of the blog. We encourage you to focus your comments on those medical and health topics and we appreciate your input. Thank you for your participation.

Posted by:
Filed under: Cancer


Share this on:
Terry   October 28th, 2008 6:26 pm ET

Back in the day, pencils had lead in them, I know I had them in my mouth, chewing away while in class or doing homework. I was actually stabbed with one when a classmate was handing one to me, I still have the mark on my palm if I look really hard for it, that was over 30 yrs ago and I’m still alive and kicking.

Breezy   October 29th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Pencil “lead” is made with graphite and has been made with graphite since the 1500s or so. (Never lead. That was a misnomer.)

Terry Marcellin-Little   October 29th, 2008 2:34 pm ET

The following text, as borrowed from Wikipedia, points out that the “lead” in pencils has been — for many a century now — made of graphite, etc., but not the (highly toxic) element Lead which was used by scribes in ancient Rome. I’m assuming you weren’t chewing on pencils in school THAT long ago…

“A pencil is a writing or drawing instrument consisting of a thin stick of pigment (usually graphite, but can also be coloured pigment or charcoal) and clay, usually encased in a thin wood cylinder…”

“.. The archetypal pencil may have been the stylus, which was a thin metal stick, often made from lead and used for scratching on papyrus, a form of early paper. They were used extensively by the ancient Egyptians and Romans. The word pencil comes from the Latin word pencillus which means ‘little tail’… “

mary peck   October 29th, 2008 6:00 pm ET

Now, the PAINT might have contained lead!

OhBoy   October 29th, 2008 7:31 pm ET

My main problem with all of these laws that go too far, including those that force you to be safe with your own life (seat belts) is the following.

Are we trying to make people live forever? We do not have the room or resource for humans that live until 150 years old. Death is required. As horrible as that sounds, people need to die sooner or later.

Frankly, a large portion of the population does nothing to add to the overall good. I’m talking about the increase in criminals and stupid kids that will never go anywhere. A bigger population just makes it worse by having less to go around, hindering the production of better people.

I know this all sounds bad, even fascist in a way but its a fact that needs to be considered.

Let people live they way they want and take the risks they want as long it doesn’t pass on that risk to someone else. If they die….then so be it. I’d rather live to the fullest for a short period than lead a long dull existence. Live and stop worrying about death! There’s nothing you can do to stop it.

Al   October 29th, 2008 9:10 pm ET

I wonder if they use lead in the production of the warning sticker.

Joel   October 30th, 2008 3:58 pm ET

Take a look at your Christmas tree lights this December, folks. Lead warnings all over them.

Joe not the plummer   October 30th, 2008 4:13 pm ET

While I agree that pencils we’ve all used did not contain lead……

I would not quote Wikipedia to make a point, not a reputable source of accurate information.

Joe, Boulder CO   October 30th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Personally, I won’t buy any product with this warning label. The onus should be on the manufacturer to use alternative and safer materials… why should I spend money on something that’s going to give me and my family cancer. 1 in 100,000 (even after 70 years) is far too much. This junk needs to get off the market. Wake up, people.

Tiffany   October 30th, 2008 5:25 pm ET

Death by music player? I think not.
I think this law is just a LITTLE bit harsh.

“…one in 100,000’ chance of developing cancer as a result of that exposure.”

Yeah, let us attempt to save that 100, 101st person from dying of cancer from a MIDI used for 70 years straight even though it was probably obsolete by the fifth year they had it, and that the other 100,000 people will be saved, even though half of the other 100, 000 people will probably have cancer in some form anyway. Give me a break. But I do admit, as a rabid nature lover, I do give them props for ,erm, exuberance?

John   October 30th, 2008 6:32 pm ET

My only fear with this is the meaning of the label is diminished. How does a person know how much lead or other dangerous chemical is in an object? I would imagine some products bearing that label may actually be dangerous to handle more than necessary, while evidently there is no danger at all to handle other products.

Frank   October 30th, 2008 9:18 pm ET

It’s amazing how there’s no one leading one big effort to twarf the cancer epidemic. People die of cancer by the hundreds of thousands and no one knows why. They just keep going to work, hoping to be avoided. First there was the Dodo bird, then there was the chemical soup happy Dodo humans. We’re killing the environment in which we live in and we’re killing others and ourselves. Some Godly image. Looks like we are doing the same thing as a cancer does. -Frank was here.

Tom   October 30th, 2008 10:53 pm ET

The lead in Led Zeppelin was also found to be non-toxic but had excellent riffs.

Tom

David   October 31st, 2008 10:59 am ET

I understand the need for the warning labels on products, but there has to be a better measuring stick than the “more than one excess case of cancer out of 100,000 people over a period of 70 years”. That is beyond extreme and just plain silly. Given what has been described in the article, I’m surprised we don’t see that sticker on EVERY single item sold.

California had a good intent in writing that law, but they went beyond sane. Overkill like this will cause those warning stickers to be useless as no one will bother to read/care about them since they will be ubiquitous.

Rob   October 31st, 2008 12:09 pm ET

Just to clear up a point on some of the earlier posts — the lead in pencils was in the yellow paint on the outside, not in the graphite.

Sandra Ihrig   November 1st, 2008 2:31 pm ET

Lead in anything is a bad thing. My family was poisoned by lead in our drinking water. It came from plumbing materials used to deliver the drinking water. It was a nightmare trying to identify what was causing our symptoms. The most vulinerable population are children who have developing brains and the fetus who can’t expel the lead once exposed.

Jagad Guru fan   November 1st, 2008 10:46 pm ET

I agree with John on this one. It is becoming more difficult to say what is really dangerous and what is not. Despite that, I appreciate labels of the sort that are definitely more honest than say- the mobile phone retailers who are quick to declare that mobile phone or wifi radiation is completely safe.

Jeramie   November 7th, 2008 10:19 am ET

But the article brought out the main drawback – out of fear of litigation, every company will put the sticker on every item, regardless of whether it contains lead or not, simply to cover their bases. We’re reaching a point where every item on the market will have a generic, overly broad warning that it might in some way cause harm.

Anyone using a computer right now has toxic heavy metals right next to them. To say “I refuse to buy these items for my health” might as well throw their computer, car, TV, cell phone, etc out right now. This is nothing new in our lives.

Steve Jones   February 24th, 2009 11:20 pm ET

You are right you shouldn’t buy products with this warning label…but the warning label was in manual which was sealed in a plastic bag inside the box! Maybe if they put it on the outside like a pack of cigarettes but when they put in the back of the manual right after the Japanese section how am I suppose to see it before I buy it? Am I really going to go through the trouble of returning this product now? What a pointless thing! Now I don’t like the idea of using this keyboard and my desire to study is really diminished.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN's chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends -- info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.

Editor's Note

Medical news is a popular but sensitive subject rooted in science. We receive many comments on this blog each day; not all are posted. Our hope is that much will be learned from the sharing of useful information and personal experiences based on the medical and health topics of the blog. We encourage you to focus your comments on those medical and health topics and we appreciate your input. Thank you for your participation.

subscribe RSS Icon
twitter
@sanjayguptacnn: http://twitpic.com/agirh - this is an mri scan of the brain. any guesses?
Updated: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:23:25 +0000
@sanjayguptacnn: lost 5 # in haiti - disagreeable food, scorching heat and long days. not a healthy way to lose weight. gingerly getting back to health...
Updated: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:36:31 +0000
@sanjayguptacnn: this is what i've been working on the past several days: http://tr.im/scjf - watch for more this week #cnn #truth
Updated: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:21:25 +0000
@sanjayguptacnn: http://twitpic.com/a8gl5 - there are some remarkably beautiful areas of haiti. ocean and mountains of port au prince. more this week.
Updated: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:29:20 +0000
@sanjayguptacnn: saw this in july's fortune magazine: "don't eat anything that's not worth eating". think abt that b4 every meal. #1023
Updated: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:04:18 +0000
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP